The Most Innovative Visual QA Tool in 2026

The problem with the QA process today is that it usually takes a lot of time, which translates into higher costs and stretched-thin deadlines.

The designer’s vision doesn’t always reflect accurately in the final product. Small things like out-of-sync coloring, incorrect text style or sizing, or misplaced visual elements can make the entire design feel off. 

That’s when the QA hell begins. Screenshot the problems, inform the developers, wait for them to implement the changes, review the results, and accept the changes or redo the entire process. It takes time, it’s stressful, and it’s ineffective.

Why Standard QA Tools Aren’t Enough in 2026

The main problem here isn’t that the QA tools available today simply aren’t good enough, that they aren’t flagging the right design implementations. The main problem is the over-reliance on the human element.

Let’s consider how the standard QA process works today:

1. The design team forwards the complete Figma file to the development team
2. The development team does the front-end work and forwards the product to the QA team
3. The QA team then starts flagging the differences between the Figma design and the live website
4. They communicate those differences to the development team in stages, typically via screenshots highlighting those specific problems
5. Back-and-forth ensues in the main communications channel to clarify confusions, double-check corrections, ask more questions, etc.

While the first three steps are necessary, the last two are not and it’s these last two steps that make the QA process eat up so much time. There are many reasons for that. 

One of them is designers having difficulties explaining why some features aren't 1:1 with the Figma file. This can lead to long back-and-forths with the development team or even create confusions regarding what needs correction and to what degree.

Then there’s the problem of flagging pages correctly. Without a structured review status system in place, both designers and front-end developers may have difficulties tracking which page have been completed, which are in progress, and which are still unaddressed.

DualCheck fixes everything.

How DualCheck Makes QA Easy and Intuitive

DualCheck automates a lot of the QA process by allowing you to overlay your Figma design directly onto the live website. The left-to-right slider highlights all of the differences between the design concept and the end product in real time with one sweep of a cursor.

This is already a massive time-saver. It makes spotting the differences a lot easier, when compared to having the two designs side by side and switching back and forth to notice the visual contrast between the different elements. The slider makes it vastly easier to spot those differences.

DualCheck also has an embedded editing system, similar to how GoogleDoc works. Rather than highlighting the problems in separate screenshots and sharing them via Slack one by one, DualCheck allows you to leave comments directly on the live page. 

Designers can highlight the problems still needing correction, while the developers or the QA team can update each task’s status right there on the website.

Who is DualCheck For?

DualCheck is a good visual regression tool for anyone in the web design industry. It’s great for in-house teams thanks to eliminating the back-and-forth during the QA process and it’s awesome for agencies that need to handle multiple projects at the same time.

DualCheck allows developers to verify the differences between the Figma design and the live website, leave comments and recommendations, and change the status of the different tasks right there on the website. This system makes the QA process shorter, easier, and eliminates the confusion associated with using standard QA tools.

If you want to give DualCheck a try, register here and you can start testing our system today.

‍

‍