How Candid Leap Reduced QA From 2–3 Review Rounds to One
Candid Leap is a Webflow Enterprise agency building scalable, high-performing websites for growing companies. As projects became more complex, manual Figma comparisons made QA slower and harder to trust.
After adopting DualCheck, the team replaced manual overlays with reliable visual comparisons. Most projects now clear QA in one round instead of two or three, with clearer feedback and greater confidence before delivery.
Challenge
Before DualCheck, Candid Leap relied heavily on manual visual checks to compare developed websites with their original Figma designs.
The biggest issues were:
- Manually resizing and layering Figma over the developed website
- Juggling Figma, the browser, and Marker.io at the same time
- Difficulty knowing whether something was genuinely incorrect or simply rendering differently
- Feedback based on judgment rather than clear visual evidence
- Two or three review rounds needed for a typical project
Small differences in typography, color, spacing, and image sizing were particularly difficult to verify. The team needed a more reliable way to identify mismatches before they reached the client.
Solution
Candid Leap integrated DualCheck into its website QA process.
Using DualCheck, the team was able to:
- Compare Figma designs directly with developed websites
- Identify visual mismatches during the first QA pass
- Replace manual overlay guesswork with a reliable comparison
- Give developers clear and actionable feedback
- Reduce uncertainty and unnecessary debate
- Catch issues before client delivery
The biggest improvement was making QA more objective. Instead of saying something “looks a little off,” the team could show developers exactly what needed attention.
Results
- Most projects now clear QA in one round
- Reduced review cycles from two or three rounds to one
- More objective and reliable visual comparison
- Clearer, more actionable feedback for developers
- Less debate and back-and-forth during QA
- Greater confidence before client handoff
- Visual inconsistencies caught earlier in the process
What’s Next
Candid Leap continues using DualCheck while looking forward to features that make visual QA even more automatic and structured.
The team would like to see:
- Automatic detection of font color, spacing, and image-sizing differences
- Priority flags for launch-blocking issues
- Tags for organizing different types of feedback
- Additional statuses for tickets waiting on clients or missing assets
- A more complete replacement for its existing QA tools
These improvements would help the team prioritize critical issues, track blocked tickets, and reduce manual checking even further.
Final Thoughts
For agencies delivering complex Webflow websites, manual comparisons can make QA slow, subjective, and difficult to trust.
Candid Leap used DualCheck to replace Figma-overlay guesswork with a more reliable review process. By catching visual issues earlier and giving developers clearer feedback, the team reduced most projects from two or three QA rounds to one helping them deliver polished websites with greater confidence.
